<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Giant Impact Theory on EARTH Magazine</title>
		<link>https://www.earthmagazine.org/tags/giant-impact-theory/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Giant Impact Theory on EARTH Magazine</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
			<copyright>American Geosciences Institute. All rights reserved.</copyright>
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:29:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.earthmagazine.org/tags/giant-impact-theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Moon formed from pulverized Earth mantle</title>
				<link>https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/moon-formed-pulverized-earth-mantle/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:29:09 -0500</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/moon-formed-pulverized-earth-mantle/</guid>
				<description>&lt;figure class=&#34;earth-figure&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.americangeosciences.org/static/earth/moon-formed-pulverized-earth-mantle/Cantner_MoonImpact.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;Artist&amp;#39;s conception of the violent impact that formed the moon. Credit: K. Cantner, AGI.&#34; loading=&#34;eager&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;figcaption&gt;Artist&amp;#39;s conception of the violent impact that formed the moon. Credit: K. Cantner, AGI.&lt;/figcaption&gt;&#xA;&lt;/figure&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Scientists have long thought that the moon was formed when an impactor crashed into Earth, some 100 million years after the planet&amp;rsquo;s formation. But details of this collision, and how the moon formed in its aftermath, remain puzzling. Now, researchers have found new potassium isotopic evidence that suggests the moon condensed from a superheated cloud of Earth&amp;rsquo;s mantle material after an extremely violent collision vaporized the impactor and much of the proto-Earth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New lunar research answers old questions, poses others</title>
				<link>https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/new-lunar-research-answers-old-questions-poses-others/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:12:09 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/new-lunar-research-answers-old-questions-poses-others/</guid>
				<description>&lt;figure class=&#34;earth-figure&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.americangeosciences.org/static/earth/new-lunar-research-answers-old-questions-poses-others/Robinson_Taylor_74220-383-scale_flat.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;This optical micrograph shows pyroclastic glass beads in a lunar rock sample brought back during the Apollo missions. Scientists detected lunar water in glass beads similar to these in 2008. Credit: G.J. Taylor, HIGP.&#34; loading=&#34;eager&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;figcaption&gt;This optical micrograph shows pyroclastic glass beads in a lunar rock sample brought back during the Apollo missions. Scientists detected lunar water in glass beads similar to these in 2008. Credit: G.J. Taylor, HIGP.&lt;/figcaption&gt;&#xA;&lt;/figure&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;From its close perch in the sky, the moon has long mystified artists, lovers and scientists. Now a quartet of recent papers — all of which touch on the moon&amp;rsquo;s violent birth and turbulent infancy — may help scientists put two long-standing lunar mysteries to rest, while deepening a third enigma and suggesting a speculative solution to a fourth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Moon could have formed from Earth after all: Reviving and revising the giant impact theory</title>
				<link>https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/moon-could-have-formed-earth-after-all-reviving-and-revising-giant-impact-theory/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:16:26 -0500</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/moon-could-have-formed-earth-after-all-reviving-and-revising-giant-impact-theory/</guid>
				<description>&lt;figure class=&#34;earth-figure&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.americangeosciences.org/static/earth/moon-could-have-formed-earth-after-all-reviving-and-revising-giant-impact-theory/Cantner_MoonImpact.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;New models indicate that the moon could have indeed been born from Earth following a giant collision. Kathleen Cantner, AGI&#34; loading=&#34;eager&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;figcaption&gt;New models indicate that the moon could have indeed been born from Earth following a giant collision. Kathleen Cantner, AGI&lt;/figcaption&gt;&#xA;&lt;/figure&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;figure class=&#34;earth-figure&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.americangeosciences.org/static/earth/moon-could-have-formed-earth-after-all-reviving-and-revising-giant-impact-theory/Cantner_MoonFormation.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;Two new models show how a moon compositionally similar to Earth could have formed from a giant impact. Kathleen Cantner, AGI&#34; loading=&#34;lazy&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;figcaption&gt;Two new models show how a moon compositionally similar to Earth could have formed from a giant impact. Kathleen Cantner, AGI&lt;/figcaption&gt;&#xA;&lt;/figure&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Scientists are revisiting the age-old question of how Earth&amp;rsquo;s moon&#xA;formed. New models indicate that it could have been born from the Earth&#xA;following a giant collision after all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
