Casting a seismic shadow

Seismic Lines. Credit: Kathleen Cantner, AGI. Credit: Kathleen Cantner, AGI.

In the week or two before the magnitude-8.6 Indian Ocean earthquake in 2012, Earth was unusually quiet, with few large quakes over magnitude 5. Afterward, seismic activity all over the globe was elevated for more than a week. Then, suddenly, global seismicity dropped off precipitously: Beginning two weeks after the mainshock, no earthquakes of magnitude-6.5 or greater occurred for 95 days.

“This event was really a freak in terms of the aftermath,” says Fred Pollitz, a geophysicist at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in Menlo Park, Calif., who led a study on the event published in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America in April 2014. Typically, he says, “we see a magnitude-6.5 quake somewhere in the world about once every 10 days, so to go more than three months without one is really remarkable.”

Suppression of seismicity on a global scale can be likened to apples ripening on a tree, says Ross Stein, a geophysicist at USGS in Menlo Park and co-author of the study. “If every week, half a dozen apples fall off the tree in the normal process of ripening, and then you go for a week with no apples falling, there are probably a lot more apples ready to fall than normal,” Stein says. “Now if you shake the trunk, you might get a lot more apples falling at once. Then, you might have to wait longer than normal to see more apples ripen and fall again.”

The pattern challenges the previously held notion that dynamic stresses can only increase earthquake rates, rather than inhibit them, Pollitz says. “It’s possible that instead of moving fluids into a fault zone, certain stresses can also move fluids out and pull the fault away from failing,” he says. “Then you’ll see a quiet period until the fault returns to being close to failure.”

Mary Caperton Morton

Mary Caperton Morton

Morton (https://theblondecoyote.com/) is a freelance science and travel writer based in Big Sky, Mont., and an EARTH roving correspondent.  

Sunday, October 19, 2014 - 06:00

Did you know ...

EARTH only uses professional science journalists and scientists to author our content?  In this era of fake news and click-bait, EARTH offers factual and researched journalism. But EARTH is a non-profit magazine, and at least 10 times more people read EARTH than pay for it. As advertising revenues across the media decline, we need your help to ensure that we can continue bringing you the reliable and well-written coverage of earth science you know and love. Our goal is not only to inform our readers, but to inform decision makers across the economic and political spectrum about the science of our planet. So, we need your help. By becoming a subscriber or making a tax-deductible contribution to support EARTH, you can fund our writers and help make sure the world knows about our planet.

Make a contribution

Subscribe